Working... -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Sayre Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:17 PM To: Mark S. Miller Cc: es4-discuss@mozilla.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ES3.1 Object static methods rationale document
Maybe someone could just give the rationale for leaving out Object.extend? Douglas Crockford wrote that it was considered, but I'm confused since it looks like you haven't even seen a proposal, and didn't participate in the discussion to exclude it. - Rob 2008/7/16 Mark S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> And? The doc gives rationales for design decisions. What's the >> rationale for leaving Object.extend out? > > If the document needs to give rationales for leaving out each thing we did > not include, it would be quite a long document. What is the argument for > adding Object.extend()? A pointer to Resig's message or a prior discussion > is an adequate response. > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM > _______________________________________________ > Es3.x-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es3.x-discuss > -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." _______________________________________________ Es3.x-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es3.x-discuss _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
