Okay, that confirms my guess that parsing is isolated per file, then what 
about simplifying this to per-file convention-based pseudo-privacy? As I 
mentioned, a way to indicate that members starting with underscore are to 
be perceived private, and:
- they should be used at least once within same module/class (e.g. 
no-unused-private-methods)
- they should not be referenced outside of current module/class (e.g. 
no-privacy-violation) 

Sounds simple enough and for that application it should be fine

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ESLint" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to