>* Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? +1
D. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Hirsch, Richard Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Jänner 2009 09:18 An: [email protected] Betreff: [VOTE] Web UI options Last night on the scrum call, we were discussing various options for the Web UI and I wanted to summarize what we were discussing and ask the community on what option we should follow. -Situation- We currently have a Web UI running at the main ESME server at http://esme.us. This version is very early iteration and has various issues associated with it. It is also based on the old core code based at the Google Code site. We now have a new new ESME core code base which is located at Apache. This version of the code at Apache is the most recent code base and includes a better split between UI and server code. The Apache version, however, currently doesn't have UI code in such maturity that we could use it to replace the existing Web site at esme.us. Bill has also created a description of a new ESME UI which probably depicts what the next UI is going to look like. This description is currently incomplete inasmuch as certain UI features are still not depicted. -Vote- The vote deals with the decision whether we want to build an intermediary Web-UI based on the existing Apache Core or whether we want to skip the intermediary Web UI and focus on the "BillF" UI? Choices (Please Vote!): * Create an intermediary UI * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? Once the community makes a decision on this issue, we will define the associated tasks to support the decision. Dick
