That would be awesome!
I am all for
* Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?.
It makes no sense to me to make an intermediary UI if we can use
Mrinal's UI to bridge the gap.
A.
On 7. jan.. 2009, at 11.17, Hirsch, Richard wrote:
We could have a Stax-based version up and running quickly. I just
need the war file from Mrinal.
People who view this version must be made aware that this UI
probably won't be available after the BillF UI comes.
D.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Anne Kathrine Petteroe [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Jänner 2009 10:59
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Web UI options
On 7. jan.. 2009, at 10.32, Vassil Dichev wrote:
Generally I shouldn't be trusted about UI decisions, but it doesn't
seem that working on something that will be discarded shortly will
pay
off. Any pros for using intermediary UI?
Pros would be that I need a better looking UI for demo purposes.
First of all I have had an interview lined up for 5 weeks already,
which I have had to cancel twice because of problems with the COIL
server.
Now that the COIL server is no longer there, I don't have an instance
where I can show off ESME with a better looking UI.
Not sure for how much longer I can postpone it.
Secondly, my company is very interested in investing in ESME this
year, but they don't want to take a second look at it until we have a
more contemporary UI than the current one. I feel it would be a pity
to throw away a possibility for an investement only because we didn't
have a UI.
We don't have any competitors here, so if we really want to, we can
make it happen.
- Anne
* Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?
+1
