thanks
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Mrinal Wadhwa <mrinal.wad...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > David, > > > > I wasn't aware we already had calls for conversations, actions and pools > > ... > > > There should be calls for conversations and actions. Pools are new, so > there may not be calls for those. > > > > > > just saw them, are these fully functional, or in progress? > > > > Thanks > > Mrinal > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:10 AM, David Pollak < > > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > Ethan, > > > > > > We've had an Air client since day 1 and have all the APIs to support > the > > > AIR > > > client (other than user authentication). What APIs are missing for > your > > > YQL > > > version? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > David > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ethan Jewett <esjew...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > It sounds like the project has been going down the road of decoupling > > the > > > > UI > > > > from the backend for a while, resulting in a situation where we are > > > pretty > > > > close to having the ability to use a generic UI took like Atlas to > > build > > > > the > > > > canonical front-end for ESME. > > > > I assume that the interaction between the Atlas-built front-end and > the > > > > ESME > > > > server would be based on either the existing public API or a private > > API. > > > > I'm not sure if this is the case, but maybe David can clarify. > > > > > > > > Would it be of interest to the group to pursue a course of action in > > > which > > > > the ESME UI interacts only with publicly defined API methods (with > the > > > > possible exception of authentication)? This might help drive the > > > evolution > > > > of the API. It could also make it easier to have interchangeable UIs, > > so > > > we > > > > don't end up in UI limbo whenever a major change to the UI is > proposed > > > and > > > > so that enterprise implementors can have an easier time deploying > > > > custom(ized) UIs. > > > > > > > > I'm going to start working on an ESME wrapper using YQL that will > call > > > the > > > > API pretty soon now, so hopefully that will help drive the API > > > development > > > > a > > > > bit as well, but I figure the more people developing against the API > > the > > > > better. > > > > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > > > <yoji...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > I agree with David. > > > > > If Altas really is as good as it looks like, I think we should > check > > > out > > > > > the option of switching from jQuery to Cappuccino. > > > > > > > > > > I think we need to clarify David's question about using non-open > > tools > > > in > > > > > Apache-hosted projects first though. > > > > > > > > > > /Anne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 21. juli. 2009, at 18.55, David Pollak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Richard Hirsch < > > > hirsch.d...@gmail.com > > > > >> >wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Question is when is the beta going to be released? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Dunno... but it does raise another issue... what's the Apache > policy > > > of > > > > >> using non-open tools in order to build Apache-hosted projects? > > Atlas > > > is > > > > >> not > > > > >> open. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> We might not be able to wait until it is released. The UI (or > > absence > > > > >>> thereof) is the main probelm at the current time. > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Yeah. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Another issue might be that we are currently focused on JQuery > but > > > > >>> 280atlas is Cappuccino-based. > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> The weight of the jQuery dependency is very light... I'd opt for > the > > > > cost > > > > >> of > > > > >> switching to Cappuccino if we had a killer GUI builder option. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> D. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:18 AM, David > > > > >>> Pollak<feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Folks, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Please take a look at http://280atlas.com/ > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Who has interest in building the ESME GUI with this tool? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> David > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > > > > >>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > > > >>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > > > > >>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > > > > >> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > > > >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > > > > >> Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > > > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > > > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > > > > > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp >
