I really like how we are discussing things on the list right now :-> D.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > I just checked Jira to see which tasks are included in the 1.0 release and # > 26 is included. > Should we move it to 1.1? > If it turns out to be a roadblock for 1.0 I suggest we move it, if not let's > leave it and do it if we feel we have the time and resources for it. > > /Anne > > On 15. okt. 2009, at 22.10, Vassil Dichev wrote: > >>> I think rendering and parsing issues are probably fairly important for >>> a 1.0 release in general, as I take "1.0" to be saying "This is ready >>> for actual deployments to end-users" and non-developer users tend to >>> be fairly unforgiving about rough edges in presentation. On the other >>> hand, respecting anchors in URLs may be something we can live without. >> >> I'd like to remind you that there is a workaround, which is known (I >> think it was documented in the old google code issue). You can escape >> the hash symbol- instead of "#", write "%23". Admittedly, this is not >> very intuitive or easy to remember, and it also doesn't work where >> URLs are automatically posted by the RSS/Atom action. > >
