I agree that move it to 1.1. Enhance conversation is more interesting than this.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe < [email protected]> wrote: > I just checked Jira to see which tasks are included in the 1.0 release and > # 26 is included. > Should we move it to 1.1? > If it turns out to be a roadblock for 1.0 I suggest we move it, if not > let's leave it and do it if we feel we have the time and resources for it. > > /Anne > > > On 15. okt. 2009, at 22.10, Vassil Dichev wrote: > > I think rendering and parsing issues are probably fairly important for >>> a 1.0 release in general, as I take "1.0" to be saying "This is ready >>> for actual deployments to end-users" and non-developer users tend to >>> be fairly unforgiving about rough edges in presentation. On the other >>> hand, respecting anchors in URLs may be something we can live without. >>> >> >> I'd like to remind you that there is a workaround, which is known (I >> think it was documented in the old google code issue). You can escape >> the hash symbol- instead of "#", write "%23". Admittedly, this is not >> very intuitive or easy to remember, and it also doesn't work where >> URLs are automatically posted by the RSS/Atom action. >> > > -- Scala中文社区: http://groups.google.com/group/scalacn
