Hi Anne, I guess I can login either with a login name + password or with an openid, right?
Wouldn't it make sense to put a separating line, or any other visual cue, between the password field and the openid field? Regards, Markus On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe < [email protected]> wrote: > Update: > I told the designer to mix design nr. 1 and nr. 2 - this is the result: > http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/3.html > > I like it, hope you do too, as I have already told her to continue with the > next pages. > > /Anne > > > On 28. okt. 2009, at 15.54, Mrinal Wadhwa wrote: > > Hi Anne, >> >> I like #2 better .. its more light weight. >> The grey/blue backgrounds in #1 make it feel a little heavy >> >> As Ethan mentioned the type is a little off ... bigger size and >> increased letter spacing could help. >> I'd suggest >> http://www.codestyle.org/servlets/FontStack?generic=sans-serif&stack=Lucida%2BSans%252CLucida%2BGrande%252CLucida&font-size=large >> (see after the selection dropdowns) The font stack builder is a handy >> tool to try different combinations >> http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/BuildBetterCSSFontStacks.shtml >> >> I also liked our old logo choice better ... using alternating colored >> dots gave an abstract feel of people connected in a network .. which >> is lost if we use the same dots. >> _ >> Mrinal >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So far four like #2 and three #1. >>> >>> I would actually like to see a mix of the two. >>> I really like the top half of #2, but like the bottom half and the >>> section >>> below the sign on element of #1 better. >>> >>> These templates are also just suggestions, so please feel free to say >>> what >>> you like/don't like. >>> We haven't finalized the look and feeling yet. >>> I will however set a deadline for this tomorrow morning, as I would like >>> to >>> finish the design as fast as possible. >>> >>> /Anne >>> >>> On 27. okt. 2009, at 19.27, Vassil Dichev wrote: >>> >>> I like #2 a bit better. >>>> >>>> Seems the opinion is split. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >
