I like #6 too If we're going for #3 for the home page and #6 goes well with that for messages
Looking back at all the images I personally like #2 + #4 better ... the white background I feel breathes nicely and feels lighter. Also #2 has more round edges than the other options .. overall feels softer ...just a personal preference though Thanks of getting this done Anne, With regards, Mrinal On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > My vote is for #6. > But I will ask her to make a version where the blue is a bit lighter, I > think the message box is a bit heavy. > > Couple of things/answers: > 1. I will ask the designer to make a template with icons instead of "reply, > resend, conversation". It is easier to make a decision after we have seen > what it looks like. > 2. Tags will be entered using hashtags. This is the standard for all > micromessaging services as far as I know, and I don't think we should try to > push for a different one. > 3. Tags will be displayed inline in the messages as links (like today). > Displaying links on a seperate line takes up too much screen estate IMO. > 4. The mockup only displays 4 messages, because it is only a mockup. There > is no need for the designer to draw all messages. > Once the design is up and running, the message page will show all 40 > messages, and the "older newer" links removed as we currently don't support > pagination. > > /Anne > > On 30. okt. 2009, at 16.20, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >> More thoughts: >> >> I agree with Dick that the tags for a message should probably be >> displayed in the message somehow, if this is possible without >> cluttering everything up. >> >> Also, is the intention to only display 4 messages per page? I don't >> think that's going to work very well. Maybe more like 30. (Twitter >> displays 20, for comparison.) >> >> Ethan >> >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I like 6 and I like the single text box message entry and the way the >>> pool selection is labeled "share with". We should probably not be >>> asking our users to learn what a "pool" is. Perhaps it should be >>> changed in the menu on the right as well, but to what? >>> >>> I would prefer that we continue to let tags be entered using the >>> hashtag format rather than providing another field, though perhaps >>> this could be a configuration option. I would prefer it be possible to >>> specify tags that do not appear in the action message through a >>> different UI, through actions, or through the API, rather than in the >>> main UI. >>> >>> Ethan >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Where are message tags displayed? I don't see any? >>>> >>>> How do you add tags to a message? Just via hashtags? No extra text >>>> field? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Next UI vote, this time for the message page template. >>>>> >>>>> Nr. 4: http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/4.html >>>>> Nr. 5: http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/5.html >>>>> Nr. 6: http://www.joyreyes.com/clients/esme/6.html >>>>> >>>>> Nr. 4 and 6 look very similar, the only difference is the grey >>>>> background >>>>> behind the messages. >>>>> >>>>> /Anne >>>>> >>>> >>> > >
