If I remember correctly, david mentioned discussions of the scala list about supporting 1.5. So the problem may lie there.
D. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > ESME/lift has at least changed more in a year than NetWeaver has LOL. > I wanted to compare the obvious differences between all servers (not only NW) > to see if there is anything else than the JDK we should look at. > > Markus, > We think that the problem is that some JDK 1.6 specific code has snuck into > ESME. > David wrote this last month: "The issue *may* be that we compiled Lift and > ESME with JDK 1.6 and perhaps a 1.6ism crept into the code. Anyway, I've got > the source to Lift and ESME and I will make it work." AFAIK no one has had > the time to look at this yet. > > /Anne > > On 15. des. 2009, at 13.09, Markus Kohler wrote: > >> Hi all, >> As I mentioned already it also doesn't run on jetty with jdk 1.5. But it >> does run with 1.6 on a tomcat based server that I tried as well. >> Therefore I think it would make sense to get it running on jetty/tomcat on >> JDK 1.5 first just because then there's one unknown less >> >> Regards, >> Markus >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Richard Hirsch >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I don't know what changed to causethe problem - ESME has changed a lot >>> since then - I'm assuming lift has changed as well. I'm also assuming >>> that we were using jdk 1.6 back then as well >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Yes, I know. I was just curious. >>>> >>>> /Anne >>>> >>>> >>>> On 15. des. 2009, at 12.54, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was the old version from Google Code. >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Does anyone know what ESME was running on at COIL last year? >>>>>> It would be interesting to know as we already had ESME running on >>> NetWeaver. >>>>>> >>>>>> /Anne >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 15. des. 2009, at 09.48, Markus Kohler wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Dick, >>>>>>> The idea was that 7.2 runs on JDK 1.6 and the chances that ESME would >>> run >>>>>>> out of the box would be higher than with 7.1 which runs on JDK 1.5. I >>> have >>>>>>> never seen ESME running on JDK1.5, and therefore I suspect that the >>> issue >>>>>>> might just be caused by the JDK version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Markus >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Richard Hirsch < >>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd try using a normal 7.1 CE first. I've had enough trouble getting >>>>>>>> it to work in that environment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> D. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Markus Kohler < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> Just a short update from my side >>>>>>>>> I tried to get some load tests running last night, and I was almost >>>>>>>>> successful. >>>>>>>>> The test is still buggy, there seems to be a multi threading issue >>> and >>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>> not exactly doing what it is supposed to do, but I got some hints >>> how to >>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also wanted to try to get ESME running on CE 7.20, and tried to >>> install >>>>>>>>> the latest CE version. Unfortunately that turned out to be an uphill >>>>>>>> battle, >>>>>>>>> in short it just didn't work. >>>>>>>>> I have to find a recent version that works on my machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Markus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > >
