Yes, and Markus already answered that it was just decided on the Scala mailing list that Scala 2.8 will run on 1.5. So far so good. I would still like to know why we have a problem with JDK 1.5 though ;-)
/Anne On 15. des. 2009, at 13.18, Richard Hirsch wrote: > If I remember correctly, david mentioned discussions of the scala list > about supporting 1.5. So the problem may lie there. > > D. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ESME/lift has at least changed more in a year than NetWeaver has LOL. >> I wanted to compare the obvious differences between all servers (not only >> NW) to see if there is anything else than the JDK we should look at. >> >> Markus, >> We think that the problem is that some JDK 1.6 specific code has snuck into >> ESME. >> David wrote this last month: "The issue *may* be that we compiled Lift and >> ESME with JDK 1.6 and perhaps a 1.6ism crept into the code. Anyway, I've got >> the source to Lift and ESME and I will make it work." AFAIK no one has had >> the time to look at this yet. >> >> /Anne >> >> On 15. des. 2009, at 13.09, Markus Kohler wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> As I mentioned already it also doesn't run on jetty with jdk 1.5. But it >>> does run with 1.6 on a tomcat based server that I tried as well. >>> Therefore I think it would make sense to get it running on jetty/tomcat on >>> JDK 1.5 first just because then there's one unknown less >>> >>> Regards, >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Richard Hirsch >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know what changed to causethe problem - ESME has changed a lot >>>> since then - I'm assuming lift has changed as well. I'm also assuming >>>> that we were using jdk 1.6 back then as well >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Yes, I know. I was just curious. >>>>> >>>>> /Anne >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 15. des. 2009, at 12.54, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It was the old version from Google Code. >>>>>> >>>>>> D. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Does anyone know what ESME was running on at COIL last year? >>>>>>> It would be interesting to know as we already had ESME running on >>>> NetWeaver. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Anne >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 15. des. 2009, at 09.48, Markus Kohler wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Dick, >>>>>>>> The idea was that 7.2 runs on JDK 1.6 and the chances that ESME would >>>> run >>>>>>>> out of the box would be higher than with 7.1 which runs on JDK 1.5. I >>>> have >>>>>>>> never seen ESME running on JDK1.5, and therefore I suspect that the >>>> issue >>>>>>>> might just be caused by the JDK version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Markus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Richard Hirsch < >>>> [email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd try using a normal 7.1 CE first. I've had enough trouble getting >>>>>>>>> it to work in that environment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> D. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Markus Kohler < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> Just a short update from my side >>>>>>>>>> I tried to get some load tests running last night, and I was almost >>>>>>>>>> successful. >>>>>>>>>> The test is still buggy, there seems to be a multi threading issue >>>> and >>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>> not exactly doing what it is supposed to do, but I got some hints >>>> how to >>>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also wanted to try to get ESME running on CE 7.20, and tried to >>>> install >>>>>>>>>> the latest CE version. Unfortunately that turned out to be an uphill >>>>>>>>> battle, >>>>>>>>>> in short it just didn't work. >>>>>>>>>> I have to find a recent version that works on my machine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Markus >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" -- Alan Kay >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
