----- Original Message ----
> From: Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 5:35:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
>
> Robert, can you please clarify your concerns:
>
> 1. You have stated that the suggested copyright statement is factually
> incorrect. I do not see how that is that case, as portions of the
> files *are* copyright as described.
>
> 2. You are stating that having the notice in the file is dangerous. How?
>
> Given the extensive prior discussion of this issue and the appearance
> of a consensus on both this list and the legal-discuss list, I think
> you owe this project a more thorough explanation along with your veto.
Unfortunately Robert can take his veto, continue to act like a child,
and apply it to releases as well, as the legal team has the power to
veto those too. I've requested advice from legal counsel as to
how to proceed as that is the only way to proceed from here, other
than complying with Robert's demands until he accedes.
