----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 11:58:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: Ethan Jewett
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 5:35:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Copyright issue (ESME-47)
> >
> > Robert, can you please clarify your concerns:
> >
> > 1. You have stated that the suggested copyright statement is factually
> > incorrect. I do not see how that is that case, as portions of the
> > files *are* copyright as described.
> >
> > 2. You are stating that having the notice in the file is dangerous. How?
> >
> > Given the extensive prior discussion of this issue and the appearance
> > of a consensus on both this list and the legal-discuss list, I think
> > you owe this project a more thorough explanation along with your veto.
>
> Unfortunately Robert can take his veto, continue to act like a child,
> and apply it to releases as well, as the legal team has the power to
> veto those too. I've requested advice from legal counsel as to
> how to proceed as that is the only way to proceed from here, other
> than complying with Robert's demands until he accedes.
Robert's veto has been invalidated by legal counsel. Count his vote as
a simple -1 and proceeed.
