I would say four letters is good in this case because it makes the acronym pronounceable. People love pronounceable acronyms.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Uday Subbarayan <[email protected]>wrote: > I would suggest even dropping "Experience". 2 letter is good, 3 is OK but > not 4! > > my 2c again, > Uday. > > ------------------------- > > I do not blog but e-write: > > http://uds-web.blogspot.com > > --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: ESME - Name > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 3:27 PM > > Just do it I'd say :) > Would go well with our first release actually. > > > On 1. feb. 2010, at 16.24, Sig Rinde wrote: > > > Good one, simple but obvious :) > > > > > > On 1 February 2010 16:09, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We've talked about changing it to "Experience" > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Uday Subbarayan > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> The word "Experiment" in ESME may indicate to end users as an > research project than a product. How about just using ESM? Some thing like > Enterprise Social Mapper or Enterprise Social Messenger or.... > >>> > >>> my 2c, > >>> Uday. > >>> > >>> ------------------------- > >>> > >>> I do not blog but e-write: > >>> > >>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- http://erikengbrecht.blogspot.com/
