I just want to jump in and say the 4 letters is better than 3. I know a lot of search forms don't allow searching for for terms of only 3 letters. My searches for CXF stuff runs into that all the time.
Dan On Tue February 2 2010 10:24:23 am Erik Engbrecht wrote: > I would say four letters is good in this case because it makes the acronym > pronounceable. People love pronounceable acronyms. > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Uday Subbarayan > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > I would suggest even dropping "Experience". 2 letter is good, 3 is OK but > > not 4! > > > > my 2c again, > > Uday. > > > > ------------------------- > > > > I do not blog but e-write: > > > > http://uds-web.blogspot.com > > > > --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: ESME - Name > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 3:27 PM > > > > Just do it I'd say :) > > Would go well with our first release actually. > > > > On 1. feb. 2010, at 16.24, Sig Rinde wrote: > > > Good one, simple but obvious :) > > > > > > On 1 February 2010 16:09, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> We've talked about changing it to "Experience" > > >> > > >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Uday Subbarayan > > >> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> The word "Experiment" in ESME may indicate to end users as an > > > > research project than a product. How about just using ESM? Some thing > > like Enterprise Social Mapper or Enterprise Social Messenger or.... > > > > >>> my 2c, > > >>> Uday. > > >>> > > >>> ------------------------- > > >>> > > >>> I do not blog but e-write: > > >>> > > >>> http://uds-web.blogspot.com > -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
