@Ethan - If you'll commit the patch after your test - I'll do a stax deployment tomorrow.
Thanks. D. On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Imtiaz, > > My patch modified two files: style.css and streams.html. > > If you backed out the changes to streams.html only and left style.css > as it was before, then I think we should be OK. I'll retest with the > patch later today. > > Thanks for the patch! > > Ethan > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> wrote: >> Let me elaborate... >> >> The last deployment on Stax without this bug according to Dick was on July >> 12th. >> >> Ethan made a change and checked in 17th July which has caused this bug. >> >> I simply undid his checkin; re the revert to 942677 which is the 10th May >> checkin. >> >> Reference: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/info_view/streams.html?view=log >> >> Imtiaz >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Imtiaz Ahmed H E" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:14 PM >> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >> >> >>> Find attached to the Jira autologically named file >>> ESmeJira259PatchByRevertingTo_r942677_Reopens231Presumably.diff :-) >>> >>> Somebody now needs to re-look at 231 :( >>> >>> Imtiaz >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>> <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM >>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>> >>> >>> The last stax deplyoment ( >>> http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12, >>> 2010. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the >>>> date >>>> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see >>>> what >>>> happened. >>>> >>>> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment. >>>> >>>> Imtiaz >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>>> >>>> >>>>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see >>>>> that it works there. >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dick, >>>>>> >>>>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, >>>>>> this >>>>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it >>>>>> was >>>>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it >>>>>> done >>>>>> asap. >>>>>> >>>>>> Imtiaz >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM >>>>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the >>>>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example, >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to >>>>>>> deploy it on stax. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> D. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
