This is a bug. The selector box has to be on the top of the page. I used a CSS trick to get it to stay there.
Maybe you should revert back to the version before your initial change? D. On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > I've applied this patch minus the pubsubhubbub stuff that was in > there. It looks to me like it is working, though the streams selection > interface has moved to the bottom of the page now, so that may be > undesirable. > > I'm still not sure why the order matters here. Seems to me like a bug .... > > Ethan > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's what I did unknowingly! :) >> >> Imtiaz >> >> Imtiaz Ahmed H E >> Cell +91.98452 84561 >> Bangalore, India >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:29:07 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >> >> Hi Imtiaz, >> >> My patch modified two files: style.css and streams.html. >> >> If you backed out the changes to streams.html only and left style.css >> as it was before, then I think we should be OK. I'll retest with the >> patch later today. >> >> Thanks for the patch! >> >> Ethan >> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Let me elaborate... >>> >>> The last deployment on Stax without this bug according to Dick was on July >>> 12th. >>> >>> Ethan made a change and checked in 17th July which has caused this bug. >>> >>> I simply undid his checkin; re the revert to 942677 which is the 10th May >>> checkin. >>> >>> Reference: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/info_view/streams.html?view=log >>> >>> Imtiaz >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Imtiaz Ahmed H E" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:14 PM >>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>> >>> >>>> Find attached to the Jira autologically named file >>>> ESmeJira259PatchByRevertingTo_r942677_Reopens231Presumably.diff :-) >>>> >>>> Somebody now needs to re-look at 231 :( >>>> >>>> Imtiaz >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>>> >>>> >>>> The last stax deplyoment ( >>>> http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12, >>>> 2010. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the >>>>> date >>>>> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see >>>>> what >>>>> happened. >>>>> >>>>> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment. >>>>> >>>>> Imtiaz >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see >>>>>> that it works there. >>>>>> >>>>>> D. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dick, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it >>>>>>> was >>>>>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it >>>>>>> done >>>>>>> asap. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Imtiaz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM >>>>>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the >>>>>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example, >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to >>>>>>>> deploy it on stax. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> D. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
