This was a problem with the html code - I've corrected it. I still need to check to see if JDBC problem is still present
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> wrote: > For the record, I was always using FireFox and I didn't have this > straightforward problem before. It looks as if the problem crept in > during/after Dick's vacation since I fixed search during his vacation and > didn't have this problem. > As this and Dick's mail imply, it may have crept in since as part of the > changes to handle browser dependencies or maybe some other Message-related > code changes. > Should be easy to narrow down. > > Created ESME - 279 : Search result does not show message text for matches. > > Imtiaz > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:58 PM > Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search > > > I'll test again tomorrow and if the problem still exists - I'll create > a JIRA item with a better description of the steps I took - then we > can compare. > > @Imtiaz - can you post a JIRA issue with the search bug using FF > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> FireFox latest update happened yesterday 3.6.9 if I recall right. >> I'm outside with my hand-held at the moment! >> >> Imtiaz >> >> Imtiaz Ahmed H E >> Cell +91.98452 84561 >> Bangalore, India >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:30:26 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search >> >> strange >> >> what browser are you using? >> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> It works for me for the 'tags' 1.1 version with Derby jdbc. >>> >>> But there's a nice new bug apparently, where the search results don't >>> show >>> the message, for example, searching for 'abra' in >>> >>> imtiaz4 >>> abra abra >>> public 9 minutes ago via web >>> >>> results in >>> >>> imtiaz4 >>> public 10 minutes ago web >>> >>> Imtiaz >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>> <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 11:02 AM >>> Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Didn't actually try running the tagged version (1.1)... >>>> >>>> Looked at the compass config files. >>>> >>>> Did you use compass.jdbc.cfg.xml (for Derby) or >>>> compass.mysql.jdbc.cfg.xml >>>> (for MySQL) ? >>> >>> used both - I tried to localize the problem with the derby-based file >>>> >>>> Obviously, you did this - for the MySQL version provided the appropriate >>>> driverManager element in the config xml file ? Right now the file has >>>> the >>>> element commented out and without any real values...as I had created it. >>> >>> I added the values for the stax environment and deployed it there but >>> it didn't work >>>> >>>> The jdbc Derby version should work, it *had* worked for me when I >>>> renamed >>>> it >>>> to compass.cfg.xml, when I fixed it earlier... >>> >>> it worked for me as well - what is strange is that the derby-based >>> index db isn't being created when the app starts and after adding a >>> word and then searching, nothing is found. I thought my UI changes >>> might be the reason but when I changed to file-based compass indexes >>> it worked. >>>> >>>> Let me know and let's see if I need to try out the tagged version on my >>>> system... >>>> >>>> As Ethan suggested once, enter a new message and look for a word in the >>>> message... >>>> >>>> Imtiaz >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:50 AM >>>> Subject: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search >>>> >>>> >>>>> I've been testing the tagged version and I'm having some problems with >>>>> the jdbc-based search. I tried it on stax and it didn't work and then >>>>> I tried it locally and it didn't work. I switched back to file-based >>>>> indexes and it worked again. Maybe someone else can have a look to see >>>>> if the tagged version has some error. >>>>> >>>>> What is strange is that it worked at one time. I have no idea what >>>>> changed. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
