Can you close the Jira issue? Or, should I? Is it that the reporter closes
an issue after verifying that it is fixed ?
The issue is showing up as unscheduled...I'm not able to change it to Fix
For Release 1.1...would you...I can't figure out how to do that in the Jira
UI!
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search - Created ESME 279
This was a problem with the html code - I've corrected it.
I still need to check to see if JDBC problem is still present
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]>
wrote:
For the record, I was always using FireFox and I didn't have this
straightforward problem before. It looks as if the problem crept in
during/after Dick's vacation since I fixed search during his vacation and
didn't have this problem.
As this and Dick's mail imply, it may have crept in since as part of the
changes to handle browser dependencies or maybe some other Message-related
code changes.
Should be easy to narrow down.
Created ESME - 279 : Search result does not show message text for matches.
Imtiaz
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search
I'll test again tomorrow and if the problem still exists - I'll create
a JIRA item with a better description of the steps I took - then we
can compare.
@Imtiaz - can you post a JIRA issue with the search bug using FF
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
FireFox latest update happened yesterday 3.6.9 if I recall right.
I'm outside with my hand-held at the moment!
Imtiaz
Imtiaz Ahmed H E
Cell +91.98452 84561
Bangalore, India
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:30:26
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search
strange
what browser are you using?
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]>
wrote:
It works for me for the 'tags' 1.1 version with Derby jdbc.
But there's a nice new bug apparently, where the search results don't
show
the message, for example, searching for 'abra' in
imtiaz4
abra abra
public 9 minutes ago via web
results in
imtiaz4
public 10 minutes ago web
Imtiaz
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]>
wrote:
Didn't actually try running the tagged version (1.1)...
Looked at the compass config files.
Did you use compass.jdbc.cfg.xml (for Derby) or
compass.mysql.jdbc.cfg.xml
(for MySQL) ?
used both - I tried to localize the problem with the derby-based file
Obviously, you did this - for the MySQL version provided the
appropriate
driverManager element in the config xml file ? Right now the file has
the
element commented out and without any real values...as I had created
it.
I added the values for the stax environment and deployed it there but
it didn't work
The jdbc Derby version should work, it *had* worked for me when I
renamed
it
to compass.cfg.xml, when I fixed it earlier...
it worked for me as well - what is strange is that the derby-based
index db isn't being created when the app starts and after adding a
word and then searching, nothing is found. I thought my UI changes
might be the reason but when I changed to file-based compass indexes
it worked.
Let me know and let's see if I need to try out the tagged version on my
system...
As Ethan suggested once, enter a new message and look for a word in the
message...
Imtiaz
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:50 AM
Subject: [REL 1.1] Problems with JDBC-based Search
I've been testing the tagged version and I'm having some problems with
the jdbc-based search. I tried it on stax and it didn't work and then
I tried it locally and it didn't work. I switched back to file-based
indexes and it worked again. Maybe someone else can have a look to see
if the tagged version has some error.
What is strange is that it worked at one time. I have no idea what
changed.
Thanks
D.
