Hello Irene,

that your system is crashing is clear because if you use the generic driver in RTAI context you are loosing your realtime behavior completly. You will only produce overruns.


Greatings

Andreas

Am 11.05.2011 12:01, schrieb Kaashoek, I. (Irene):
Hi,

Erwin, thanks again for the files and your quick response. I have never used the xenomai 
kernel, I will take a look at it. I am still a bit confused by all the different versions 
and names that exist in the "ethercat world", I think I have to read a bit on 
the different rt kernels that exist.

The problems with the generic driver are solved. By changing the RTAI stack size in 
Simulink model>  Configuration Parameters>  Real-Time Workshop>  Etherlab C 
code generation options to 3000 instead of the default 2000, my (very simple) Simulink 
model worked (allthough the total pc crashes when you want to do something else while 
running the model at 1kHz, while I had that only at 20kHz with the native driver on 
another pc).

Cheers,
Irene



-----Original Message-----
From: etherlab-users-boun...@etherlab.org 
[mailto:etherlab-users-boun...@etherlab.org] On Behalf Of Erwin Burgstaller
Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 11:34
To: etherlab-users@etherlab.org
Subject: Re: [etherlab-users] Kernel question

Hi,

* Wed, May 11, 2011 - 08:48:33 +0000, Kaashoek I. Irene - irene.kaash...@tno.nl:

My suggestion to solve the problems would be to compile another preempt kernel, 
kernel 2.6.29  and then use the master and driver files from Erwin Burgstaller. 
Then I would perhaps need to find a slightly older version of etherlab so that 
it is compatible with the master.
As I'm currently very busy otherwise and I have no intentions to move to 
another kernel version, the only thing I can do at the moment, is provide you 
the matching xenomai-kernel and xenomai itself too:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26324125/linux-2.6.29.5-xenomai-2.4.9.tar.bz2
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26324125/xenomai-2.4.9.tar.bz2

We're not using etherlab, so I can not provide anything for that.

Best thing would be of course, if someone will patch the latest kernels native 
e1000e driver, but it's very different from the previous one, so one will have 
to start from scratch. :-(

The NIC we're using is 'Intel Corporation 82573L'. So I'm sure it's working for 
this one and I don't know if it will with 82574L or 82567LM

Cheers,
  Erwin

--
Erwin Burgstaller
_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
etherlab-users@etherlab.org
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at 
http://www.tno.nl/emaildisclaimer

_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
etherlab-users@etherlab.org
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users


Mit freundlichem Gruß

Andreas Stewering-Bone

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Andreas Stewering-Bone
andreas.stewering-b...@igh-essen.com
Tel.: +49 201 / 36014-15

Ingenieurgemeinschaft IgH
Gesellschaft für Ingenieurleistungen mbH
Heinz-Bäcker-Str. 34
D-45356 Essen
Amtsgericht Essen HRB 11500
USt-Id.-Nr.: DE 174 626 722
Geschäftsführung:
- Dr.-Ing. S. Rotthäuser,
- Dr.-Ing. T. Finke,
- Dr.-Ing. W. Hagemeister
Tel.: +49 201 / 360-14-0
http://www.igh-essen.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
etherlab-users@etherlab.org
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Reply via email to