On 09/04/14 16:52, Martin Troxler wrote:
Hi Pier
  >$ sudo cyclictest -t5 -p 99 -n 500
gives better values than the -i 500 Option.

Regards
Martin

Note:
This e-mail is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any system. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure, distribution or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Thank You.


Dear Martin


What you write works only with the realtime kernel... ?


We are using the Standard Ubuntu Kernel

The application runs under a Software Interrupt at 1.5 or 2 milliseconds...

we measured that it may have around 100 microseconds variation... ( Do you call it Jitter ? )

So this is ok for our control application....



Which are the problems that  we may have  with the standard kernel ?

Do you have a list of them ?

I  did not know that the realtime kernel it's a must for etherlab...


When sometimes ago I tried to use the Realtime kernel from the Ubuntu Repository

the size of the video screen was limited to 1024*768 and we cannot use the 1920*1080

screen resolution for the Graphic Application and Video that we have.

Also there was another restriction that now I do not recall now....


Do you think that the  : Working counter changed to 0/113

( that may happens once every 2 or 3 hours )

it's because we use the standard kernel ?


Is the realtime kernel the only solution ?



Thank you very much...


Best Regards

Pier


--

Perlsoft GmbH
Sennereigasse 27
3900 Brig
Switzerland

Tel. +41977022933

_______________________________________________
etherlab-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users

Reply via email to