On 7/2/07, Jesse Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ditto for me, but I would like to test it and take a look at the code > > first. We also need to discuss with the author the possibility to > > relicense code under BSD, I think it's GPL licensed. The problem > > could lies in the fact Chronographer is under GPL license iirc. > > It doesn't depend on Chronographer anymore, so that shouldn't be a > problem. I'm not sure what libical is under though, which is what it > uses now.
libical is under Mozilla Public License 1.0 or LGPL. So I think the dependency is fine. We just need to ask him to use BSD for the application part. The code also looks fine to me. So if there is no other objection, I will sent out the invitation shortly and we can discuss with him for the details. Yen-Ju > > J. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Etoile-discuss mailing list > Etoile-discuss@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss > _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list Etoile-discuss@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
