for those of you don't do yahoo groups: ..criteria deleted..
In the event of any failed criteria, once the above searches for better copies have been conducted, and we are satisified no better copy exists, the seed goes to vote on egroups. a minimum of 10 people must vote, and the majority decides whether it gets labeled as dank or gets rejected. All relavent discussion and comments on the dankness of the seed will be included in the .dnk file which answers Pete's bathroom recording question. Yes, it could be dankified. (not to be confused with funkified) chris jones wrote: >If you wat to find out what makes a show "dank", then read about it: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dankseeds/ >This group was not formed as a giant pissing contest, only to try to make >more great seeds available. > >Chris > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >andy hopkins >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:07 PM >Cc: GJP; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [etree] q's about etree terminology > > >Don't think that this addresses Pete's original question as to the >overall quality of the show. >A good example of this is trey 7/4/01 (see below). The show has 'pa >problems' throughout - while this is all documented, the problems still >exist. What makes the show 'dank'? (I hate that fucking term) - the >'danksters' seem to use this as their criteria: _______________________________________________ etrade mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etrade
