there's lots of guessing going on about that... fact...we'll know when SCI tells us rumor...$18 - 20 for a 3 disk set, including show-specific artwork
Sometimes I think they throw these ideas out, then read the listservs for a few days to see how people react...not a bad way to go if you want to test the waters before jumping in. Wherever he goes, the people all complain... Rama -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of BB Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [etree] Question about SCI's new policy And just what are these shows going to cost? [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.etree.org/bobZemuda (.shn list) AIM: olandbill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Mininger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Josh Chasin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [etree] Question about SCI's new policy > You're correct Jeff. Pearl Jam's official stance on their official 2000 > tour bootlegs was "Trade 'em...we don't care." Simple, easy to understand, > no bs, no confusion... > > I would assume SCI's official releases would be non-tradeable UNLESS they > specifically say that trading the shows is OK. > > Anyone? > > Ken > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mininger.org > http://db.etree.org/mininger > > At Thursday 11:54 2/7/02, Josh Chasin wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Jeff Silverman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Interesting question... > > > If people are paying for the recordings, I doubt that we could legally > >trade > > > them. > > > What has me thinking is their stance that "fans can still continue to tape > > > and trade all shows". Seems like as they have grown, they have patterned > > > some things after the way phish did things, so I'm wondering if somewhere > > > down the line (especially if this ends up being a successful business > > > decision for them) they are going to adopt a phish-like policy about what > > > versions of released shows can and can't be listed/discussed/traded in a > > > public forum like this. > > > >I think it is important to underscore that these policies are for the band > >to make, and for etree to adhere to. Am I recalling correctly that Pearl Jam > >has explicitly stated that their fans may trade copies of their dozens of > >officially released bootlegs of their 2000 US and european tours? > >_______________________________________________ > >etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree > _______________________________________________ > etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree _______________________________________________ etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree _______________________________________________ etree.org etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
