Gnome is the "great unfinished project" and works even though you know
it'll get better. It has lots of potential, but we'll see where it
goes.
KDE is good and easy to transition to, but has funky licensing.
Why no just run a real wm without all the extra crap on top of it?
--Mike
Bob Miller wrote:
> Harald Sundt wrote:
>
> > Prime Time for Linux "is arriving" a little more than "arrived".
>
> That's for sure.
>
> Hey, here's a question for the assembled wisdom. Which desktop
> environment is going to dominate Linux in three years? KDE had an
> early lead, but it hasn't had a stable release in over a year, and
> Gnome is progressing rapidly. Gnome seems to have a lot more
> commercial development (e.g., Eazel, Helix) and buzz going. It's not
> clear to me which project has the bigger development community.
>
> So what's going to happen? (Microsoft Desktop for Linux. *-: )
>
> --
> K<bob>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.jogger-egg.com/
