I must apoligize to the readers of this list.  I have committed another 
punishable crime--> Over the holidays I installed the latest cygwin
distribution.  (http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/)  This is a beta
distribution that runs on top of Windows 9X, ME, or NT.  Randolph is 
peering into the future with Plan 9.  But cygwin is for those of us 
in the trenches still dragging a windows anchor around.

If you've tried cygwin or delorie ports of common unix programs in the
past, and had any possible use for them, it might be time to try again.  
A few months ago a rudimentary packaging system (although it's still 
based on tarballs) was started for a more efficient distribution of 
updates.  

I was surprised at how much is now working.  Not just gcc, bash, perl,
and the usual win32 capable gnu-ports, but a substantial portion of a 
working gnu system.  On my cygwin system, and I added a few optional 
contributed components--it takes up about 350mb, and there are over 
850 files in /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin.  Yes, even "X 6.4" works in 
full screen mode. (although not perfectly) 

The whole system crawls compared to Linux, but it's nice not to have 
to boot as often just to run some bash script.  Even the cdrecord tools 
work well under win32.  Things like symlinks, permissions, threads, 
device access, and networking are still as broken as a native windows 
machine, but lots of stuff works well.  

I remember the dosemu project used to be called the "ugly duckling" of 
unix.  And the samba, vnc, win4lin, vmware, djgpp, and many other projects 
also seem to be frowned on by the gnu/linux community for being too 
friendly with M$ products.  In reality, most freeware (as in free speech) 
seems to co-exist well with proprietary software, and it's the commercial
products which introduce incompatibilities for the sake of marketing and
so-called "product differentiation."  Cygwin is now distributed for free
and it fills a need--how many times have you wished you had some 
basic unix tools on a windows box?  

If I don't get flamed too badly for this post, I'll write a short review 
of running gimp on -ouch- win32.

Ralph

Reply via email to