That's an interesting question.  Are we an organization at all, or a
collection of anarchists?  ;)

It depends on our purpose and mission.  As stated on the website,
"The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group (EUGLUG) is a volunteer group
 whose goal is to promote and exchange information about Linux, Unix and Open
 Source Software in Eugene, Oregon and surrounding cities. "

Based on that expressed mission, I'd say we're closer to a 501(c)(4) type
of group.  Not that it matters much, since we're not earning any income,
and not receiving any donations that I know of.  

Apologies in advance for spamming the list with-->
Excerpts from Internal Revenue Code SECTION  501.(c)-----
     (3) Corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation,
     organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable,
     scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational
     purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports
     competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the
     provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention
     of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of
     which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual,
     no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on
     propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except
     as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not
     participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or
     distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or
     in opposition to) any candidate for public office.

     (4) --
          (A) Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but
          operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, or
          local associations of employees, the membership of which is
          limited to the employees of a designated person or persons in a
          particular municipality, and the net earnings of which are
          devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational
          purposes.

          (B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an entity unless no part
          of the net earnings of such entity inures to the benefit of any
          private shareholder or individual.

     (5) Labor, agricultural, or horticultural organizations.

     (6) Business leagues, chambers of commerce, real-estate boards, boards
     of trade, or professional football leagues (whether or not
     administering a pension fund for football players) not organized for
     profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit
     of any private shareholder or individual.

     (7) Clubs organized for pleasure, recreation, and other nonprofitable
     purposes, substantially all of the activities of which are for such
     purposes and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the
     benefit of any private shareholder.

At 10:28 AM 2/17/2001 -0800, "jfk321" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Are we a 501(C)(3) organiozation?  If not perhaps a government demo day
>woould be an interesting idea. When we can show linux to state and federal
>legislators.  If there is a Salem LUG perhaps with them or if they are
>501(c)(3) someone with them could get us space there and state IT contacts
>to show case linux. OK people we probably can get away with casual dress.
>Jim K
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jamie Chamoulos -- Internet.Now!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 12:09 AM
>Subject: [EUG-LUG:176] A call to action (fwd)
>
>
>> cool...
>> Jamie
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:27:35 -0800
>> From: Toby Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: A call to action
>>
>> Great. Yet another attack by Microsoft.
>>
>> Toby
>>
>> ----------------------------------- forwarded ----------------------
>>
>> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Feb 16 08:38:26 2001
>> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:24:05 -0800 (PST)
>> From: Franklin Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] M$ Feels Threatened by Linux (fwd)
>>
>> from another LUG, pretty interesting for those following current
>> discussions on /. or such.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:31:56 -0600
>> From: Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [SATLUG] M$ Feels Threatened by Linux
>>
>> Friends,
>>
>> Let me take off my information technology hat and put on my mortarboard.
>>
>> I am formally trained as a political scientist and have been heavily
>> involved in local and national politics since graduating from college.
>> My national political involvement has been as a acquisition professional
>> trying to influence congress to take necessary actions to protect the
>> integrity of the federal government's acquisition process.
>>
>> First and foremost, what we have in this article,
>> (http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4833927.html) "Microsoft exec
>> calls Linux a threat to innovation", is Microsoft (MS) FUD.
>>
>> Second, if I were in MS position, I would do exactly as they are
>> doing...
>> they are waiving the American Flag, talking of Mom and apple pie...we
>> (Microsoft) are the good guys and Linux is the foreign devil.
>>
>> I KNOW FOR A FACT, that the government is torn between chunking
>> Microsoft and going OpenSource and chunking Linux and going 100% MS.
>> Its a BIG political fight.
>>
>> With a new President, who may not want to push the DoJ case against MS,
>> and the economy down turn, MS is certainly pushing the right political
>> and business buttons.
>>
>> The REAL scary thing is that right now MS could make their point and
>> win.
>>
>> Some congressmen/women and a few senators are thinking right down the MS
>> line...probably 25%.  Another 25% will go with open source and 50%
>> aren't smart enough to know the difference.  Whichever 25% wins will
>> take the unknowing 50% with them.
>>
>> I see GREAT E-Mails on technical subjects on this list all the time so I
>> KNOW 99.9% of you are literate and independent thinkers.  But the first
>> thing that you MUST do now is to take out your Big Chief Tablet, open
>> you box of Crayons and pen a letter to your congressman/woman and
>> senators asking them to support the use of open source software in the
>> federal government and the nation.  We must make them understand that
>> open source, such as Linux, will NOT "result will be the demise of both
>> intellectual property rights and the incentive to spend on research and
>> development" as Microsoft Windows operating-system chief Jim Allchin
>> told lawmakers.
>>
>> By law, SATLUG CANNOT lobby, and neither can any other 501(C)(3) charted
>> corporation as most LUGs are.  Thus, the ONLY thing we can do is as
>> individuals write our congressman/woman and senators.
>>
>> One only needs to look at the open source applications on the monthly
>> "Maximum Linux Magazine" CD to know that this certainly isn't "stifling
>> innovation" as Microsoft claims.  We KNOW this but lawmakers don't and
>> won't unless we, as individuals, let them know.
>>
>> I can assure you that if you take the time to write a letter (hand
>> written is best but a computer generated letter is great too) to you
>> congressman/woman and senators, (I'm talking about three different
>> letters), your VOICE WILL be heard and I would expect that you would
>> receive back, even though it might be some time in coming, as written
>> response from the lawmakers you write.
>>
>> The second thing you/we must do is get this E-Mail forwarded to other
>> LUGs.  I am CCing a friend Corpus Christi in hopes that he will send
>> this E-mail to the CCLUG mail list.
>>
>> If we can get 250,000 individuals to send letters to lawmakers, we will
>> negate Microsoft's allegations and might very well get the federal
>> government to move to requiring the federal government to use open
>> source software in lieu of MS software.
>>
>> I will be writing Congressman Charles Gonzalez and Senators Gramm and
>> Hutchison
>> in the next few days.  It is now up to you to contact you lawmakers.
>>
>> And much thanks goes to Don for bringing this to our attention.
>>
>> I want to make a special appeal to those who have advances academic
>> degrees to write letters with formal signatures.  The same applies to
>> those of you in corporate IT management positions and educators.  Your
>> letters carry a little weight than the rest of us with some lawmakers.
>> This isn't to put anyone down; but, it is a fact of life in the
>> political arena.
>>
>> 76 votes put Lyndon B. Johnson in the U.S. Senate.  I believe that
>> 250,000 letters to lawmakers will but Tux in the drivers seat.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Walt DuBose
>> San Antonio, Texas
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> "Donald W. Wright" wrote:
>> >
>> > >From C|NET News.com:
>> >
>> > Microsoft exec calls Linux a threat to innovation
>> > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-4833927.html
>> >
>> > Definitely a novel argument. Wrong, but novel. Amusing how they try to
>lump
>> > Linux with Napster as bad for "intellectual property."
>> >
>> > Those who are inclined to write (dead tree style) their congresscritters
>> > have a new target. Perhaps mention that this country was founded on
>> > open-source principles, instead of the closed-source edicts from the
>king
>> > that our ancestors found so offensive.  --Don
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------
>> > San Antonio Linux User's Group (SATLUG) Mailing List
>> > Unsubscribe: http://www.satlug.org/unsubscribe.html
>> > Post to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Problems to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> San Antonio Linux User's Group (SATLUG) Mailing List
>> Unsubscribe: http://www.satlug.org/unsubscribe.html
>> Post to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Problems to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>Shop online without a credit card
>http://www.rocketcash.com
>RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
>

Reply via email to