I should have noted the "trick" question.... IMHO nfs is for LARGE systems, such as greedy corporate or loony university systems, and those gals can afford $$ for windoze nfs clients. We of the Perpetually Empty Pocketbook don't usually come across nfs in day-to-day operations. Samba is more than adequate for filling gaps between Linux and winblowz. jk At 11:11 PM 2/24/2001, you wrote: >James S. Kaplan wrote: > > > So, how does one integrate windoze clients into an nfs system? > >I wouldn't use NFS for Windows clients; I'd use Samba. There's no >reason why you can't export the same filesystem using both protocols. > >In fact, my wife's company has its public file servers set up exactly >that way: A Solaris box has a big disk called /home. It's exported >via Samba to a bunch of Windows boxes. It's also exported via NFS to >a bunch of NetBSD, Solaris, and Linux boxes. > >-- >Bob Miller K<bob> >kbobsoft consulting >http://kbobsoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------- James S. Kaplan KG7FU Eugene Oregon USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rio.com/~kg7fu ICQ # 1227639 Have YOU tried Linux today? -----------------------------
