On 25 Feb 2001, at 9:47, James S. Kaplan wrote:

> IMHO nfs is for LARGE systems, such as greedy corporate or loony
> university systems, and those gals can afford $$ for windoze nfs
> clients.

I have a linux box that I need to mount its file system regularly from 
my linux workstation.  I use samba for this, also, rather than nfs, 
because samba is way more secure than nfs.

Just MHO,
Dennis
"Custard pies are a sort of esperanto: a  universal language." 
                     --Noel Godin  

Reply via email to