Hey, thanks, Rob. I appreciate the references. If I discover anything of
interest to EUG/LUG, I'll pass it along.
Dennis
> From: Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 20:41:24 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [EUG-LUG:2017] Re: More "Chili!Soft anyone?" from ~:>(X){===pbbbb
> bbbb bbbbt
>
> I can't really say b/c I've never used ASP. I remember reading an
> article one day comparing ColdFusion, Perl, PHP, and ASP. I think it
> was a ZD-Net article.
>
> I did find these:
>
> http://www.slashdot.org/developers/01/04/21/1432206.shtml
> http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/2000/scripting.html
>
> -Rob
>
>> On 20010805.1826, Dennis J. Eberl said ...
>>
>>> From: Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 17:40:48 -0700
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: [EUG-LUG:2015] Re: More "Chili!Soft anyone?" from
>>> ~:>(X){===pbbbbbbbb
>>> bbbbt
>>>
>>>> On 20010805.1710, Dennis J. Eberl said ...
>>>>
>>>> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
>>>>
>>>> Apache::ASP
>>>>
>>>> Anyone with experience using this alternative to Chili!$oft?
>>>
>>> Alternative? Like PHP or HTML::EmbPerl? :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It turned out that Apache::ASP so-called is highly nonstandard: you use Perl
>> instead of VBScript for scripting your ASP pages.
>>
>> PHP is slower than ASP pages, I am told. Comments?
>>
>> If I remember correctly, HTML::EmbPerl, while interesting, takes me far away
>> from ASP.
>>
>> Again, I am told that Perl is a lot slower than VBScript. Comments?
>>
>> I don't want to get into a protracted discussion of the relative merits of
>> ASP, PHP, VBScript, Perl, et cetera. I want to write bona fide ASP pages
>> using VBScript (people PAY for this :) and am seeking a server solution
>> (like Chili!Soft) that is far cheaper than anything Microsoft sells. I am
>> wondering if anyone in EUG/LUG has experience with Chili!Soft.
>>
>> Thanks for the reply, Rob.
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>
>
