Below...

> From: Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 19:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [EUG-LUG:2759] Re: US Congress already discussing bans on strong
> crypto]
> 
> Dennis, I gave you the site, and told you it was
> recent (like in the last few days).
> 
> Do the f*ing work yourself.

I did on slashdot, but wasn't I asking about the encryption we supposedly
sold to the Middle East?

> (and yes, I'm annoyed.  So far, all of your

Oh, really. Want to put it to a vote among normal human beings?

> responses are continued bullshit.  You just don't
> get it.  People have tried explaining a few
> times, and you're just missing it.

Oh, I think I get it Seth. You're an arrogant jackass with a short fuse who
doesn't like his pet beliefs challenged. Too bad for you. We can do without
you.

Dennis

> The BARN DOOR IS OPEN.
> THE HORSES ARE GONE.
> THE COWS ARE EVEN GONE.
> 
> And still our 'elected' leaders continue to rant
> on about how important it is to tie up the door
> and the horses.

Hell, Seth, I didn't know you were an elected leader.

> Encryption will NEVER be stopped.  They can have
> my PGP keys when they pry them from my cold dead
> fingers.

Are you leaving us soon. Visit some national monuments.

> My stance on this is pretty clear: I'm a
> cypherpunk.

That's a nice word for it. You sound like an ordinary asshole to me.

> When encryption is outlawed,
> bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
> 
> Come back when you can read that.
<snip>

Why would I bother?

Dennis Eberl

Reply via email to