Different mailing lists on different servers, using different programs....
I don't have activism or most of the other lists set to reply-to list because while it's commonplace, it's actaully a bad idea (for many reasons...) Personally, I'd love to drop ezmlm from euglug.net, whatever efn uses (majordomo?) and put in a nice clean mailman set of archives and lists... I'm looking up Postnuke forum <->mailing list software right now for PLUG to use... and if it looks good, we might also use that... I dunno, just a possiblity. Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: Ben Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:21 PM Subject: [EUG-LUG:260] Re: derned emails keep coming!! > As a technical aside, (and I haven't paid any mind to KMail in > particular, which > you seem to be using, jk) I've been using mozilla mail (ya, the new > 0.9.6 release now) and in the message filters, one of the filter options > is "To: or Cc:" instead of the default "Cc:", but of course there's also > rules for the subject, headers, or any message content... > It just strikes me that euglug's main list has some rules set by the > mailer that normalize everyone's list realities, which don't [yet] exist > for the activism list.... wouldn't we want all mail being forwarded by > the list server to have some kind of standardization? Sorry I haven't > run list before and don't know the ezlm (?) program mentioned earlier. > It certainly ups the tension when there are specific instructions > represented by one member, though. > There's got to be a better way (a bitter way?)... And how about those > MTA failures? > fun, eh? <sarcasm-spasm>Maybe I'll save up all my daily emotional > tensions, and blurt them out at the next user whose computer acts > quirky, lord knows mine never does!! </sarcasm-spasm> > btw, I am compliant today. > > kg7fu (by way of kg7fu ) wrote: > > >... > >Please guys, do not cc activism...cc indivuduals instead... > > > > - jk > > > >
