[EMAIL PROTECTED] run on ListProcessor(tm), version 8.2.09/990901/11:28 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Revision level: 8.2.09/990901/11:28 Last update: 990901/11:28 Manager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ListProcessor(tm) address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port: bsdi-4-0
It has a web based interface, email interface (thats what you used to subsciribe!) and I use ILP to maintain it. I looked and did not find any attachment oriented settings... I belive what james was talking about is send replied to the individual, and not cc the list, not a setting per se Jamie On Tuesday 27 November 2001 17:07, you wrote: > Different mailing lists on different servers, using different programs.... > > I don't have activism or most of the other lists set to reply-to list > because > while it's commonplace, it's actaully a bad idea (for many reasons...) > > Personally, I'd love to drop ezmlm from euglug.net, whatever efn uses > (majordomo?) > and put in a nice clean mailman set of archives and lists... > > I'm looking up Postnuke forum <->mailing list software right now for PLUG > to use... > and if it looks good, we might also use that... I dunno, just a possiblity. > > Seth > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ben Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:21 PM > Subject: [EUG-LUG:260] Re: derned emails keep coming!! > > > As a technical aside, (and I haven't paid any mind to KMail in > > particular, which > > you seem to be using, jk) I've been using mozilla mail (ya, the new > > 0.9.6 release now) and in the message filters, one of the filter options > > is "To: or Cc:" instead of the default "Cc:", but of course there's also > > rules for the subject, headers, or any message content... > > It just strikes me that euglug's main list has some rules set by the > > mailer that normalize everyone's list realities, which don't [yet] exist > > for the activism list.... wouldn't we want all mail being forwarded by > > the list server to have some kind of standardization? Sorry I haven't > > run list before and don't know the ezlm (?) program mentioned earlier. > > It certainly ups the tension when there are specific instructions > > represented by one member, though. > > There's got to be a better way (a bitter way?)... And how about those > > MTA failures? > > fun, eh? <sarcasm-spasm>Maybe I'll save up all my daily emotional > > tensions, and blurt them out at the next user whose computer acts > > quirky, lord knows mine never does!! </sarcasm-spasm> > > btw, I am compliant today. > > > > kg7fu (by way of kg7fu ) wrote: > > >... > > >Please guys, do not cc activism...cc indivuduals instead... > > > > > > - jk
