I have an opportunity, if anyone's interested. There is an open source program set that filters web content. The company that launched it lost interest. There is one guy left who says he is supporting it, but it looks like he is just talk. This thing works with Squid and a few other odds and ends. It is called netFilter. There are commercial products available but they are too expensive. I'm working with a small ISP that donates lots of time and resources to churches and the like. He can't afford anything so the effort would be volunteer.
My personal preference would to be able to administer it through Webmin which doesn't happen now. I can put this on a disk if anyone is interested in taking a look. Thanks On 2001.11.29 10:54 Ben Barrett wrote: > Snip. Snip. < > 2) Nonlocally: (Jim Beard's idea mostly?) How can we leverage the > power of the group, to accomplish greater tasks for the > linux/open-source community? Does something need ported? > bug-tested? documented? we could work together, and say it was done by > *US* and not any individual... or at least recognize the group and get > our group's name out there more... > I think it's cool that we're getting near a milestone with seti@, but > I'd rather see collective efforts and not just idle cpu time.... not > everyone has time of course, but this is why we work together. > See ya tonight! > > >It was part of a private conversation. Mail can be used for more than > just mailing lists. > > > >I didn't ignore you. I was already sending my email when I got yours. > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Linux Rocks ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:49 PM > >Subject: [EUG-LUG:306] Re: An incomplete meeting agenda for tomorrow > > > > > >>funny... you ignore me when I say that... yet I dont remember seeing > any > >>posts from kbob saying anything like that... you did that before, a few > weeks > >>ago... couldnt be that your bias'd here? or is it an outlook thing? > >> > >>Jamie > >> > >>On Wednesday 28 November 2001 16:18, you wrote: > >> > >>>KBob made an great suggestion, a written agenda for the meeting, so > people > >>>can brainstorm and so on in the meantime... and stay focused at the > meeting > >>>itself. > >>> > >>>Proposed agenda (feel free to suggest items if it's something > radically > >>>different and not close to covered by any of the specifics below) > >>> > >>>Club Organization > >>> incorporate? > >>> dues and budget? > >>> officers? > >>> > >>>Please keep in mind that *all* of the above itself is questionable, > and > >>>part of why the meeting is being held: to make some decisions (or > rather > >>>REmake some decisions, as most of these have been discussed in the > past a > >>>few times... and for many reasons, we've passed on doing them. One of > the > >>>main questions will be benefits to doing so.) > >>> > >>> Activities > >>> Clinics - how often, which night? > >>> Presentations -Monthly? > >>> Special Events - details... > >>> K-12 project? > >>> Others > >>> > >>> Meeting Space > >>> Candidate spaces > >>> EWEB > >>> U of O > >>> other? > >>> > >>> Plan of Action > >>> > >>> Other? > >>> > >>>Again, be there, be willing to commit time/energy/resources, and be > >>>helpful. Or don't come. > >>> > >>>Stan's PC Training Center, 635 West7th, 6 PM.... > >>>No PCs, no installs, not much tech, just organizational but vital... > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
