The Kernel events model looked quite fascinating, sort of like what amoebaOS does with process state. Could one use that as the basis for mobile code?
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Rob Hudson wrote: > I found his opinion of .net quite amusing. :) > > > On 20011013.0655, Jacob Meuser said ... > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:16:52PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote: > > > A printer friendly version for easy reading... > > > > > > http://www.osnews.com/printer.php?news_id=153 > > > > > > > > I really injoyed this interview about FreeBSD 5. There are also a couple > > > > > small interviews at the end, one with Theo D, the man so many love to hate. > > > > > Theo is no-nonsense as always, the same reason so many respect him. > > > > > > > > > > There is some Linux talk thrown in there for those who like that kind of > > > > > thing. > > > > Yes, nice interviews. So OpenBSD actually had the fastest BSD fs first, > > interresting, I did not know that! I found Itojun's answer to the question > > about sharing code somewhat interesting also. He's one of those people > > who have commit access to all three trees, yet he doesn't mention that. > > What a humble fellow (he's one of the "architects of IPv6", also). > > I find the question a bit odd to begin with, since that's the point of > > the BSD license. > > > > -- > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > Rob <rob_at_euglug_dot_net> > my @euglugCode = qw(v+++ e--- eug+ bsd+++ gnu+ S+++); > > Random Quote: > ------------ > Perl is the successful attempt to make a braindump directly executable. > - Lutz Donnerhacke in de.org.ccc >
