> -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EUG-LUG:478] Re: naive distro questions
<snip> > > LFS is all that's left > > Au contraire. Here is a partial list of distributions, which shows > that you've barely scratched the surface. > > http://lwn.net/Distributions/ how many broken links are there? i tried (honestly, i did) checking the LUG's list and a lot of those links are broken. > > after seeing Mac OS X, i've decided that i really don't like > > all of the "four letter wurds" used as a directory > structure. it's just > > damn unsightly. my command line should be pretty. > > Here's what Neal Stephenson says (from In the Beginning Was the > Command Line): <snip> > He says it much better than I. But on to the specifics. yeah, i had already figured out a couple of those reasons for the current naming conventions. <snippage> > I think you could get a get a minimally functional system within > a year. ok. my give up. i guess i'm stuck trying distros until the end of time... thanks for the list. time to warm up the 'ol cd burner > -- > Bob Miller K<bob> > kbobsoft software consulting > http://kbobsoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Justin Bengtson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) euglug= v+ e- eug++ bsd? gnu++ s++ "I called some kid "b" the other day. It's the price you pay for living hip-hop every day of your life." - Jerry (from the Point Blank Rangers)
