Is it my imagination? Or is Samba becoming enough like NT that it is dragging Linux into the same level of unreliability?
Mayeb I'm jsut tired. Christopher Maujean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: > >Running Samba would mean toadying to the corporate overlords by >supporting a network system based on a monopolistic, oppressive, and >sub-standard "operating" system. Funny how MS Windows and a word that >implies something that works (operating) can be used in the same >sentence. > ><grin> > >Seriously though, I have no need for samba at the moment. I have run it >before though, but never used it for more than 10 or 20 megs of files at >a time. > > Snipped <
