Samba is a well hidden plot by M$ to discredit linux. All those fine upstanding open source developers working on it are secretly on the M$ payroll.
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 16:27, Bob Crandell wrote: > Is it my imagination? Or is Samba becoming enough like NT that it is dragging Linux > into the same level of unreliability? > > Mayeb I'm jsut tired. > > Christopher Maujean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: > > > >Running Samba would mean toadying to the corporate overlords by > >supporting a network system based on a monopolistic, oppressive, and > >sub-standard "operating" system. Funny how MS Windows and a word that > >implies something that works (operating) can be used in the same > >sentence. > > > ><grin> > > > >Seriously though, I have no need for samba at the moment. I have run it > >before though, but never used it for more than 10 or 20 megs of files at > >a time. > > > > Snipped < -- Christopher Maujean IT Director, Premierelink Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.premierelink.com/ 541-344-8575x305 PGP: --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.keyserver.net/ KeyID: EFAF4176 Fingerprint: 55E6 4DE1 D7D3 361E F265 C094 46F2 7B62 EFAF 4176 ---------------------------------------------------------------
