On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 12:02, Larry Price wrote:
> On 4 Jan 2002, justin bengtson wrote:
> <snip cool distro description>

thanks!

> Isn't it a requirement for modern distros to have cool graphical installation
> and configuration programs written in python (there's a reason debian depends
> on python1.4) also anaconda which runs the RedHat and Mandrake installs.

graphical installers are not needed.  this is going to be a tarball and
utilities to make the tarball into a proper hard-drive-installed OS.

i'll most likely write a perl script as an installer, but it'll look
pretty ghetto, like the old DOS installer (the "feel" i'm going for...)

> But hey it's your distro, if you don't want clean object oriented scripting
> languages that include modules specially for reading and rewriting config files
> that's your decision ;-)

i already have one.  it's called "perl".  well, i don't know about the
modules for reading and writing config files...  

<perl advocacy>
when i was mulling over learning perl or python, one thing that drew me
to python was the strict whitespace rules.  the theory being that python
will _always_ look the same.  and then Cory pointed out to me that perl
ignores whitespace, so it can be as pretty or as groady as you want.  i
don't know about current python, but anything that *forces* me to write
code in a certain way isn't really my thing.

i've learnt to format my code in certain ways to make it more re-usable
and readable (to me, at least...)  and perl can be very readable, even
beautiful, *if* you format it (most perl coders seem to pride themselves
on how arcane and unreadable their code looks.  which means i tend to
write everything myself instead of by example...)  with python (as i
know it) you have to follow someone else's definition of whitespace. 
this makes *alot* of difference to me.

and, like any language, once you learn a little it becomes far less
arcane.  python has it's place and i certainly wouldn't criticize it
until i had learned it, but right now (and as i'm learning more of it)
the "swiss army chainsaw" is doing just fine.
</perl advocacy>

python does seem to be quite popular, so i may include it anyway,
depending on the "package" size (in k).

> ciao 
> larry
> 

Reply via email to