On Wednesday 30 January 2002 19:04, Jacob Meuser wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:43:07PM -0800, Mark Bigler wrote: > > I'd sure think that pf would do > > all they want and more. > > > > > > We have a box that acts as our uber router that will have a > > > > wireless nic, wired nic, nic for the dsl, and nic for the > > > > cable. It will be doing nat/firewall and dhcp. Thats about it. > > > > Is there anyway to tell > > > > the machine to send all packets on ports 21 and 80 through the > > > > cable and everything else through the DSL? > > You mean like this? > > cable dsl > ports \ / all other > 21,80 router ports > > net > > I don't think it's possible with pf. The kernel would have to > route by port to route the packet through the right NIC. > > That's not what NAT does. It changes the source and/or destination > IP address. Sure, it can do this selectively by port, but that's > not the same thing.
You're right. My mistake. I was thinking the packet filter might be able to "route" packets using the port field. > It may be possible with NAT and ALTQ combined, but I haven't looked > much at what ALTQ is capable of. > > These types of ideas come up with some frequency on the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ml -> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc
