When the aliens get here, we'll have computers that won't need programming.

Peter Bailey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>
>
>> some really ugly code sometimes, well ok, alot of times, but you shouldn't blame the
>> language for code produced by someone better suited to flipping burgers.
>
>
Ahh.  _That_ is why I hate java so much!
>
>
Or maybe it's because of the programming burger-men that 128 megs
>of java memory is like 4 megs in any other case.  Actually, CPU looks like
>a similar function.  cubed route of required CPU for java task == CPU
>required to do the task in visual basic with lots of bloaty options.
>
>
I can't wait to see the next generation programming languages when
>CPUs are all read in gHz dropping fractions, and all memory is super-fast,
>solid state and nobody knows what a megabyte means anymore (as if they do
>now).  Who knows, maybe competition will drain out and standards will be
>efficient and enforced.. once the aliens get here.
>
>On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Bob Crandell wrote:
>
>> I was attracted to PHP because it reminds me of C.  They both put the power of
>> choice back in the hands of the programmer where it belongs.  Yes, you end up with
>> some really ugly code sometimes, well ok, alot of times, but you shouldn't blame the
>> language for code produced by someone better suited to flipping burgers.
>>
>> $0.02 more.
>>
>> Jacob Meuser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>> >
>> >On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 07:38:16PM -0700, Bob Miller wrote:
>> >> Bob Crandell wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Larry, I'm crushed.  Do I detect a bit of prejudice here?  Please
>> >> > tell me it isn't so.
>> >>
>> >> It isn't so.
>> >>
>> >> Larry isn't prejudiced, he's just accurately describing PHP.
>> >
>> >Granted, php will let a person write horrible code.  One way
>> >to minimize the ugliness is to use php.ini-recommended instead of
>> >php.ini-dist as the php.ini.
>> >
>> >I really think Larry was talking more about postnuke in particular
>> >than php in general, tho.  I can't tell the difference in execution
>> >time between a purely Apache http authentication and a php http
>> >authentication, and none of the sites I've built with php look like
>> >slashdot.
>> >
>> >Also, running a chrooted httpd with mod_php is much simpler than
>> >with mod_perl or mod_python, as perl and python need to be able to
>> >find their modules at will (a modularly built php loads it's modules
>> >when httpd is started).  One could use 'mount --bind' or mount_null
>> >to put the modules into the chroot, but the point of a chroot is to
>> >keep as much as possible out of reach.  IOW, an attacker could
>> >modify 'remounted' perl or python modules that would later get
>> >executed outside of the chroot by unsuspecting users, possibly by
>> >root.  Other options include copying the modules into the chroot or
>> >having two separate perl/python installations.  Neither of these seem
>> >to be very easy to manage.
>> >
>> >Just my $0.02.
>> >
>> >--
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Eug-lug mailing list
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
>> >
>> --
>> Bob Crandell
>> Assured Computing
>> When you need to be sure.
>> Voice 541-689-9159
>> FAX   240-371-7237
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> www.assuredcomp.com
>> Eugene, Or. 97402
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Eug-lug mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Eug-lug mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
>
--
Bob Crandell
Assured Computing
When you need to be sure.
Voice 541-689-9159
FAX   240-371-7237
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.assuredcomp.com
Eugene, Or. 97402


_______________________________________________
Eug-lug mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to