On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 02:45:56AM +0000, Bob Crandell wrote:
> Oh man, the only thing worse than SPAM is government involvement.

I'm all for Screw The Establishment(TM), but on spam control I am willing
to hedge a little bit on the details of my freedom for the public
wellfare.  To define my thinking a bit by example:

 - You have a right to say what you want, but others have the right to
   hold you accountable for what you say.  The government does have the
   right to limit speech to the effect that they may do so in other
   venues: Free speech is not an adequate defense for charges of fraud,
   for example.

 - You have the right to send mail that is deliberately anonymous, though
   the government should be free to pass legislation making it illegal for
   you to misrepresent who you are in electronic communications.  (ie,
   they may make it illegal for me to be Bob Miller since I am not he or
   I'd have quietly leaked the series2 remote code and EEPROM passwd by
   now..  This may mean that they will require email that is anonymous to
   carry prominent indication (from field for example) that the sender has
   chosen to not name himself..)

 - The government has the right to ammend the legislation regarding
   sending of "junk faxes" to cover other electronic communications such
   as cellular phones and email where the cost of advertising is a burden
   on the recipient rather than the advertiser.  If this means absolutely
   no unsolicited commercial mail will be tollerated, then I am all for
   the costs of enforcement coming out of tax dollars.

 - It should be a crime to knowingly spread false information to the
   masses in the hope that they will buy into it and do something they may
   not otherwise do.  You need never fear the government will enact such a
   law, however, since the impact to US politics would be devastating -
   far more so than it would be to that class of spammers.

-- 
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                           Not many fishes
 
Basically, I want people to know that when they use binary-only modules,
it's THEIR problem.  I want people to know that in their bones, and I
want it shouted out from the rooftops.  I want people to wake up in a
cold sweat every once in a while if they use binary-only modules.
        -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: msg12901/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to