These tests are very un-scientific, but I'm not trying to prove anything.  
I use Mozilla on my "fast" computer and elinks on my "slow" one.  I'm
looking forward to the Mozilla Calendar, it looks pretty good, but it's
still a little unstable.

On 12/18/03 06pm, Mr O wrote:
> Have these tests all been run at various times during the day
> and in various order to  prove your results? :) I know that if
> Mozilla is already open and I bring up a new tab I can have
> euglug.org loaded before I get to blink. Of course if you're
> counting loading time for the browser too then I'm at a loss.
> 
> 
> --- Ralph Zeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I prefer elinks myself, because it does a better job IMO at
> > rendering
> > tables, even though it tests a bit slower than lynx.  The
> > fastest 
> > browser here is w3m:
> > 
> > $ time lynx -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null
> > 
> > real    0m1.056s
> > user    0m0.050s
> > sys     0m0.000s
> > $ time links -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null
> > 
> > real    0m1.162s
> > user    0m0.040s
> > sys     0m0.000s
> > $ time elinks -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null
> > 
> > real    0m1.201s
> > user    0m0.040s
> > sys     0m0.030s
> > $ time w3m -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null
> > 
> > real    0m0.789s
> > user    0m0.090s
> > sys     0m0.030s
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to