These tests are very un-scientific, but I'm not trying to prove anything. I use Mozilla on my "fast" computer and elinks on my "slow" one. I'm looking forward to the Mozilla Calendar, it looks pretty good, but it's still a little unstable.
On 12/18/03 06pm, Mr O wrote: > Have these tests all been run at various times during the day > and in various order to prove your results? :) I know that if > Mozilla is already open and I bring up a new tab I can have > euglug.org loaded before I get to blink. Of course if you're > counting loading time for the browser too then I'm at a loss. > > > --- Ralph Zeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I prefer elinks myself, because it does a better job IMO at > > rendering > > tables, even though it tests a bit slower than lynx. The > > fastest > > browser here is w3m: > > > > $ time lynx -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null > > > > real 0m1.056s > > user 0m0.050s > > sys 0m0.000s > > $ time links -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null > > > > real 0m1.162s > > user 0m0.040s > > sys 0m0.000s > > $ time elinks -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null > > > > real 0m1.201s > > user 0m0.040s > > sys 0m0.030s > > $ time w3m -dump http://www.euglug.org >/dev/null > > > > real 0m0.789s > > user 0m0.090s > > sys 0m0.030s > > _______________________________________________ EuG-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug