You'll notice that I didn't offer to volunteer for the experiment...

On Wednesday, January 21, 2004, at 11:55 AM, Bob Miller wrote:

Larry Price wrote:

it looks as though MS is at least making some effort in the
direction of providing a reasonably sane programming environment.

any one on this list tried this puppy out yet?

C'mon, Larry. You know better than that.


If uSoft wants to tempt us into getting locked into their code, then
they ought to at least offer something we can't already get with
Cygwin.  Cygwin has a better license, a better-tested code base, a
better bug fixing process, and a more trustworthy developer
organization.

true, true, probably, and definitely

I think it is interesting that they are attempting to offer what they think developers want even
though it's clear that they don't understand why it's wanted and they definitely misunderstand just exactly what IS wanted by the audience they are targeting.


I know, that's dogmatic, not pragmatic.  But how many chances are
you going to give a repeat offender?

in this case the dogmatism is actually pragmatism with a wider scope,
without access to the source and freedom to bend it to the task at hand
we eventually wind up with a vendor lock-in monoculture, and would be incapable of doing
things we need to do because we would be unable to correct even minor misconceptions about the nature of what we are doing.


--
Metaphors for system administration -----------------------------------------------
bailing the titanic with paper cups: or polishing the deck chairs thereof
steering an iceberg with a broom: nonexciting challenges await you
capturing runaway bulldozers: once is chance, twice coincidence, ...


_______________________________________________
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Reply via email to