> There is no need for /ad hominem/ personal assaults on this or any other > forum. This is totally out of line, and it is not the first time you've > tried to pick a fight with me.
Actually, if I remember, that "infamous" assault was began by an out-of-line post you made, kind of like the one you just posted. > I'm not interested. You're going into my 'Ben Barrett' filter (i.e., I > will > never see your posts again unless someone quotes one in a reply) because I > don't have time to deal with this stuff. Ah, nice /ad hominem/ personal assault on Ben, there. Do as you see fit. > I would appreciate it if you would check > facts before making accusations of ulterior motives. I checked the facts, that was the whole point of posting and correcting your plethora of untruths and lack of knowledge. You were wrong, I corrected you. I'm sorry to be so "brutal", but perhaps if it wasn't a continual and blatant thing, I'd be more kind and gentle about it. Your postings have shown both a clear disdain of Windows and a willingness to spread unfactual information and rhetoric about it. So yes, I checked the facts. > But judging from prior posts, I don't think I should expect it. Likewise, I'm sure. At least doublecheck what you're about to state. Perhaps if you spread less mis-truths through your email, you'd offend less people and earn yourself less criticism from us. See ya, /jgw _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
