I didnt notice it either, but maybe it was filtered on my end. also... I havnt been moderating for over a year (prolly 2!) I forgot the password, and well.. Ed does a good job w/out ever complaining...
Jamie On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:50:45AM -0700, horst wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:50:45 -0700 (PDT) > From: horst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Spam on euglug list > > I don't think it came through the list [Eug-lug] . I didn't see it, and my > procmail log shows no message of that Return-Path:/From: address --there > are many of that subject line, but none from that address. > Not in the archives either, as far as I can tell. > > - Horst > > > >Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:08:05 -0800 > >From: Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Spam on euglug list > > > >Edward Craig wrote: > > > >>That I haven't noticed this may be an artifact of Gmail's spam filters. > >>I wonder if examining the full headers might reveal this never passed > >>through EUGLUG servers, as I infer from the lack of munged subject to > >>include [Eug-lug]. > > > >Here are the headers. > > > > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Received: (qmail 18891 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000 > > Received: from euglug.org (HELO tux.euglug.org) (207.189.131.194) > > by chezgeek.euglug.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000 > > Received: from 207.189.131.194 (unknown [219.155.181.200]) > > by tux.euglug.org (Postfix) with SMTP > > id EC67D481; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:36:19 -0800 (PST) > > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > by 219.155.181.200 (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j3CHmn9V937414 > > for [email protected]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:36:18 -0600 > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:36:18 -0600 > > From: Wm Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.470 (Entity 5.059) > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > To: [email protected] > > X-Spam-Score: (-2.857) BAYES_00 > > X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 219.155.181.200 > > X-Scanned-By: SpamAssassin 3.511824, File::Scan 0.45, Archive::Zip 1.85 > > X-Recipient: <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re-finance before rates skyrocket > > Content-Type: multipart/related; > > boundary="------------AttPart_02541267==.OLA" > > Status: O > > Content-Length: 8682 > > Lines: 136 > > > >I don't pretend to understand mail routing. It has Received headers > >that indicate it went through EUGLUG's mail server. It doesn't have > >the [eug-lug] subject nugget to indicate it went through mailman. > > > >I note that our mailman installation is at 2.1.5, and that 2.1.6 > >fixes a security hole related to revealing passwords. > > > >-- > >Bob Miller K<bob> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_______________________________________________ > >EUGLUG mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug > > > _______________________________________________ > EUGLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
