Bob Miller wrote:
Here are the headers.
Comparing the headers you quote and the headers on the message you sent:
Received: (qmail 18891 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000
Received: from euglug.org (HELO tux.euglug.org) (207.189.131.194)
by chezgeek.euglug.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -0000
Received: from 207.189.131.194 (unknown [219.155.181.200])
by tux.euglug.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id EC67D481; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by 219.155.181.200 (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j3CHmn9V937414
for [email protected]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:36:18 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:36:18 -0600
Received: from tux.euglug.org (euglug.org [207.189.131.194]) by
mail.dimstar.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959596802E for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tux.euglug.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
tux.euglug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B836426; Mon, 23 Jan 2006
08:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from jogger-egg.com (216-210-236-194.atgi.net
[216.210.236.194]) by tux.euglug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88AB422
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=jogger-egg.jogger-egg.com)
by jogger-egg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F14Eg-0006M8-EQ for
[email protected]; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:08:06 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
They look completely different, even though they supposedly came through
the same server. Add to that there's no list tag on the message you
cite, I'd say it was spoofed headers. Also, if the headers are correct,
tux.euglug.org can't decide if it's running in PST or GMT/UCT.
Russ
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
