All I have to say about Qmail is. DJB.
Mike Miller On 4/19/06, Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Darren Hayes wrote: > > > I'm attempting to wade through the FUD comparing MS Exchange with current > > open-source Linux mail server tools. For my MTA shortlist I have postfix, > > exim, qmail and sendmail. Should I be investigating other MTA's. Any > > recommendations or suggestions? Thanks. > > Shorten your shortlist with this helpful sed command. > > $ sed s/qmail//g shortlist > shorterlist > > I've been using qmail for the last five years, and I don't like it. > It's too loosely coupled for my taste -- zillions of little config > files hold it together and when it isn't working it's just a guessing > game which config is missing/wrong. When it *IS* working, it's just a > guessing game how it's using its config. > > Sendmail is the market leader and has the best-developed ecosystem. > OTOH, sendmail is the oldest and cruftiest and has features left over > from networks that are no longer used, e.g., csnet, uucp, DECnet. > > Oh, my mistake. Patrick still uses them. (-: But he's the last. > > I've used exim and postfix a little, but not enough to have a real > opinion of them. > > -- > Bob Miller K<bob> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > EUGLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug > _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
