On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:08 AM, larry price<[email protected]> wrote:

> completely unsubstantiated rumour has it that chromeos will be running
> a framebuffer with a specialized version of XMonad.

Not an unattractive rumor. :-) XMonad is cool. I got it running awhile
back but  haven't found the time to really dig into it. It's
definitely lean and mean on the dersktop. Not sure how useful multiple
workspaces tiled on the display would be on a tiny netbook screen. But
it could have a substantial Gee Whiz factor in marketing. XMonad also
has a fair bit of extensibility for other eye candy effects, judging
by the contributed extensions.

A Chrome OS vs. Windows 7 eye candy contest for the netbook market?
:-)  Google would have the price advantage but at least an initial
disadvantage in browser extensions. Microsoft is way behind Google in
free cloud offerings with substantial uptake, albeit mostly on the
consumer as opposed to enterprise side. But netbooks are supposed to
be about the consumer market, yes?

Shifting the topic a bit, there was a perceptive take today by the
Wired magazine editor in chief on the contrast between Microsoft's and
Google's wielding of quite different "free" software as a competitive
(anti-competitive?) weapon.
<http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/07/08/anderson.google.antitrust.law/>.

I do recall a fair size body of case law on the subject. IIRC, the
thrust is that a  legal line is trespassed if your loss leaders are
intended to harm or have the effect of harming for-profit competition
in the relevant market. Always wondered why the Justice Department
didn't lob that one Microsoft's way in the MSIE bundling case.
Likewise why it's never come up in other IT contexts such as other
crippleware business models, Sun distributing OpenOffice.org, far
below cost, etc.

But that's off the top of my head. I haven't looked at that line of
cases in several years. Beyond doubt, I've at least over-generalized
that which is full of nooks and crannies.

Best regards,

Paul

-- 
Universal Interoperability Council
<http:www.universal-interop-council.org>
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Reply via email to