-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there,
Mike Müller wrote: > > For some reason I could not pin down yet, why this was different > with the relation between EPS and LO. Maybe it has something to do > with the general approach. While the LO tried to use a > consensus-based way to make decisions, I experienced the EPS relation > to the LO as a hierarchical one, just order and the LO has to follow. > Maybe my impression is wrong and other people see things differently, > but this is how I perceived it. the only entity that is to blame for the current situation with EP15 is the EPS. I have have strong doubt that the persons running EPS for years should be in charge for running the EPS in the future. I am explicitly taking out Fabio here. Unfortunately there was no chance at the general assembly at EP14 to perform any significant change in the leadership of the EPS due to the absurdness of general assembly as it was carried out. EP15 will be the last chance for EPS with its current setup to prove its right to exist. Andreas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGUBAEBAgAGBQJUl9f6AAoJEADcfz7u4AZjBhgLwJv7qCIub1OEn2olTIck+q/o dxeCenA2LzUtjvv/R+7D8lbxJRCZIOqhfdf4XMLPLsSAgA78/o0ezuOzKg8OHdyb uvJOb6F52oV45xji6ZevpmJtpMPzWAHHfZMItOkYzOuC7bSWyu8qw1e3EuyLubdD CIlh2UTv09tX5onlzHkKtJrN4UuQxhUb0a0y1BNVQyDWXd2oL9NZTdcTJ3xtmF8H a0EBNc7i9T490Beza07xEeWOw5BVqiKaTEqqTHOop4i+ZDfr731DwUh54Q6bzKhu z4V6zbBUSEiu5CgRP2j3FLBQ2XtYEjZyE3j1zgfg9vbzP3FalRAPVi4Kjf6REhUl EpUwdIT++p/MO5MdWxOl/Jf+tGS35JPW3x8OiKTMvNe0dyNQqrNHfgwSMknXq6Ni MkmgvZAeQI3CA0vsvE72u7j6VaD/t4+armZ3Me5PHL6zL1Yfb1931pHqbmjmLtBQ wnSMma9E9ybHhdAYNRyldc4GNJShRmQ= =AAe4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ EuroPython-Improve mailing list EuroPython-Improve@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
